Skip to content

feat(packer): use the Hypixel API for resourcepacks - #853

Closed
ArikSquad wants to merge 3 commits into
Swofty-Developments:masterfrom
ArikSquad:patch-1
Closed

feat(packer): use the Hypixel API for resourcepacks#853
ArikSquad wants to merge 3 commits into
Swofty-Developments:masterfrom
ArikSquad:patch-1

Conversation

@ArikSquad

@ArikSquad ArikSquad commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

we should probably just use zips to begin with

this is also required to work with the latest hypixel skyblock resourcepack

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hypixel-skyblock Ignored Ignored Aug 8, 2026 4:43pm

@ArikSquad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I used the github website to push this, did not even notice that I replaced the wrong file

fix that wrong file thing too
@ArikSquad
ArikSquad marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2026 16:43
public static class ResourcePackSettings {
@Comment("Base URL of the pack server (e.g. http://0.0.0.0:7270)")
private String serverUrl = "http://127.0.0.1:7270";

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's optimal if we just stick to one rather than supporting both and bloating our settings

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agree, only the api one would be ideal (so we dont need to host a whole packer each time)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agree, only the api one would be ideal (so we dont need to host a whole packer each time)

only the API isn't possible, ravengard isn't included. Or do you mean that for skyblockpack, we'd always use the official API but not have any settings to configure it and force people to use that instead of the packer? That's probably fine for everyone

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the API does not cover all of our cases I don't know what the benefit of mix matching is

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we could have a shared google drive with write access across collaborators that has our maps and texture packs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we could have a shared google drive with write access across collaborators that has our maps and texture packs

this is what I've been thinking of for a while! can those be downloaded programmatically?

@ArikSquad ArikSquad changed the title refactor(packer): let's trust the folder feat(packer): use the Hypixel API for resourcepacks Aug 9, 2026
@ArikSquad

ArikSquad commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I guess we won't do this but rather have a g-drive

@ArikSquad ArikSquad closed this Aug 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants